By admin 
In a victory for President Donald Trump, the Justice Department announced Friday that it secured a first-of-its-kind deportation through the Alien Terrorist Removal Court, a secretive tribunal that had never been used before the administration activated it this summer.
Read more Scientists look inside the ‘spider’ growing on the tip of a rare viper’s tail
Nazira Haji Zada — an Afghan woman who was accused by the department of assisting her son and son-in-law in planning a foiled 2024 terror plot — was deported to her home country after conceding that she was an alien terrorist, according to a DOJ press release that said an order for her removal was signed by the court’s chief judge, Judge Joan Ericksen.
Lawyers for the woman had previously indicated they were challenging the constitutionality of the court, alleging its procedures violated due-process protections and an assortment of other constitutional amendments. It is unclear, however, whether those legal questions were fully aired before the court approved Haji Zada’s deportation. The public docket had gone quiet in recent weeks, after a round of public filings posted in August.
The removal order was not immediately posted to the docket Friday morning.
Trump administration faces first major test after activating court that hasn’t heard a case in 30 years
The court was created by Congress 30 years ago as a way for the federal government to quickly deport accused terrorists in situations where using the normal immigration proceedings risked exposure of national security secrets.
Friday’s press release indicated that at some point after the first-ever public hearing in the court on July 30, a removal order was approved by the judge and the woman decided against appealing it.
“This landmark case, resulting in the prompt removal of this alien terrorist to her country of origin, is a win for national security and the rule of law,” Attorney General Todd Blanche said in the press release. “Those who support and condone terrorism should not be living in the United States, and this first-ever case before the ATRC shows how the Department will use every tool at its disposal to protect our country.”
Read more What makes young people reduce their social media use
The court’s procedures allow the Justice Department keep hidden from the public — and even from the immigrant they’re seeking to deport — classified information about why the government believes them to be an alien terrorist, a designation defined in immigration law. The cases go before Article III judges, who are seen as more independent than the Executive Branch immigration judges who consider routine deportation proceedings.
Past administrations had never sought to use the court, perhaps determining that no deportation case was so sensitive that it was worth risking a ruling finding the court unconstitutional.
Legal observers have questioned why the administration sought to use it now.
The Dallas-based Afghan woman who was deported did not speak English, and could not read or write, according to court filings.
Her son is currently serving a 15-year sentence for obtaining firearms to support a terrorist organization, having pleaded guilty to the charge. Her son-in-law — described in court filings as the driving force behind the ISIS-aligned terror plot — reached a plea deal in the prosecution but has not yet been sentenced.
In the sparse public filings the government submitted about Haji Zada to the Alien Terrorist Removal Court, DOJ described her as indoctrinating her family with ISIS ideology and taking steps to support her sons’ terror plans, which targeted the 2024 election.
“This is a historic and vitally important step in our work to protect the U.S. homeland from terrorism,” FBI Director Kash Patel said in the release. “An individual who supported a plot by ISIS-sympathizing family members to commit an attack in America has paid the price for that.”
Read more Even if it’s real, Trump’s new Ukraine push is already being undermined by events